[alsa-devel] [PATCH 11/20] ASoC: SAMSUNG: I2S: Add bit definitions

jassi brar jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 13:49:03 CET 2010

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:24:45PM +0900, jassi brar wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Mark Brown
>> > One other thing I'd suggest is that when constructing a patch series
>> > it'd be better to put the more invasive or controversial changes (like
>> > moving the headers) last.  This makes it easer to apply bits of the
>> > series if there is any controversy.
>> I thought I already made that sure.
>> In my opinion, the only controversial patch was 'header-copying' and I couldn't
>> move that any further down the series or other changes without that.
> I agree that this is the only really controversial change, but it seemed
> like pretty much all the changes that added stuff to the headers or used
> them could've been done pre-move so that they didn't depend on it.
Not sure which patch you point, but it was decision of logical
build-up and successful
compilation after each patch that made the patch series as it is now.

More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list