[alsa-devel] [PATCHv4 1/7] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 codec

[Misael Lopez]

Margarita,

> Mark,
> 
> I'll re-submit the patch series using twl6040_codec instead of
> twl6030_codec, twl6030 is the power companion chip and twl4030 is
> the audio chip, so in the case of this patch should I send an
> incremental patch to rename it?

As shown in TI's website ([1], [2]):
- TWL6030 contains PM, USB, I2C, etc
- TWL6040 contains only audio

Then, TWL6030 is the MFD and TWL6040 is a simple audio codec, and
this patch ([PATCHv4 1/7] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030 codec)
is not valid since the codec doesn't belong to the MFD anymore.

TWL6040 can become a MFD to support vibrator as Mark pointed out.

-Misa

[1] http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=12845&contentId=53245
[2] http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/twl60x0flyer_slyv008.pdf

> Regards,
> Margarita
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:23 AM
> > To: Samuel Ortiz
> > Cc: Liam Girdwood; Olaya, Margarita; alsa-devel at alsa-
> project.org; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/7] OMAP4: PMIC: Add support for twl6030
> codec
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> >
> > > > Samuel are you OK with this ?
> >
> > > That seems fine, yes.
> > > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > OK, I've applied this one now - the cross tree issues mean it
> seems
> > better to get into 2.6.34.  I'll review the rest of the patches
> now.
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel