[alsa-devel] [PATCHES_v1] ASoC: Towards dropping runtime field from snd_soc_dai

jassi brar jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 05:57:30 CET 2010

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:55:59PM +0900, jassi brar wrote:
>> <Due to some problem I am unable to send inline patches, please accept
>> the attached patches for this time>
> If you're going to do this please send just the patches as the
> attachments, including the patch description in the attachment cases
> them to come out like this:
>    ASOC: ATMEL: Getting cpu_dai method change
>    [PATCH 2/3] ASOC: ATMEL: Getting cpu_dai method change
>    Currently only the atmel driver make use of snd_soc_dai.runtime field.
> when applied which isn't ideal.
I intended them to be 'git am' applied. Anyways, I hope I don't have to
send attachments in future.

>> [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: PLATFORM: Pass dai_link as argument to suspend, resume
>> [PATCH 2/3] ASOC: ATMEL: Getting cpu_dai method change
>> [PATCH 3/3] ASOC: SND_SOC_DAI: Get rid of 'runtime' field
> Note also the different spellings of ASoC here (and elsewhere in your
> commit messages) - the first is correct.  You don't need to capitalise
> all the letters in names.

> If your problems are (as I'm guessing is the case) gmail breakage you
> might want to look into imap-send, which will dump the patches in an
> IMAP mailbox for transmission.
will check that out.

More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list