[alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: EP93xx I2S and PCM fixes
subaparts at yandex.ru
Thu Dec 9 13:17:41 CET 2010
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:54 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:37:31AM +0300, Alexander wrote:
> > > > - Formats list shortened to just S32_LE, this makes all the DMA transactions right,
> > > > while ALSA will do all sample format translation for us.
> > > Again, what was the actual problem? 32 bit samples seem very large if
> > > the hardware is capable of other formats, especially given that things
> > > like MP3 tend to produce 16 bit data.
> > It seems that EP93xx DMA could only operate 32 bit words. So the I2S
> > module is always feed by 32 bit samples. Incorrect setting of LRCLK (2
> > times slower) in original ep93xx-i2s.c masks the problem. DMA takes two
> > 16 bit samples instead of one, overall sound speed seems to be normal,
> > but you get actually 4000 sampling rate instead of requested 8000 and
> > therefore some noise... This is also the reason why the capture function
> > not worked at all in this driver...
> The approach taken by the original code (while it sounds like it still
> has issues is a pretty standard way to deal with limitations in DMA
> controllers like this. You often end up programming the DMA controller
> to transfer 32 bit chunks and the I2S controller to transfer two 16 bit
> samples then let the FIFOs on the edge of the I2S controller sort out
> the difference. This means that the DMA controller transfers a stereo
> pair of samples at a go, which works well enough. Some of the hardware
> configuration may be technically incorrect according to the spec but so
> long as the externally observable behaviour is OK that's not an issue.
I2S controller always takes 2 samples (2 ch) from DMA, DMA is always 32
bit, so if you will feed it with 16 samples, you will get 2 times faster
> It may be that there's limitations in the hardware that prevent such a
> configuration but I'd like to see more analysis of what's going on here.
If we take a look into I2S specification, we will figure that LRCLK MUST
be equal to sample rate, if we are talking about stereo (in mono too,
but it's not our case at all). So it doesnt seems strange to you,
ep93xx-i2s.c produces LRCLK two times slower than it MUST be? It's a
bug, making DMA bug less visible...
Always using 32 bit chunks is not a problem for I2S, the codec I use
uses less bits too (24), it's permitted by I2S standard.
More information about the Alsa-devel