[alsa-devel] Third time: Unlink PCM resource ?

[Werner Van Belle]

Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> If this is the wrong mailinglist, then who should I contact regarding
>> these erratic semantics ?
>>     
>
> Which API are you using?  A simple test case code would be more
> helpful to demonstrate.
>   
The api provided by libasound. I'll see whether I can generate a concise
example if there is no known solution to this problem,
> But, in general, sharing the same DSP device among different processes
> don't sound like a good idea...
>   

I agree, but when one forks off a child the parent pcm handle
automatically passes to the child. If there is a possibility _not_ to
pass the PCM handle to the forked process then I would be quite happy as
well.

Werner,-

-- 
Dr. Werner Van Belle
http://werner.yellowcouch.org/


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20090525/62e4f63b/attachment.sig