[alsa-devel] Third time: Unlink PCM resource ?

Werner Van Belle werner at yellowcouch.org
Mon May 25 19:52:47 CEST 2009

Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> If this is the wrong mailinglist, then who should I contact regarding
>> these erratic semantics ?
> Which API are you using?  A simple test case code would be more
> helpful to demonstrate.
The api provided by libasound. I'll see whether I can generate a concise
example if there is no known solution to this problem,
> But, in general, sharing the same DSP device among different processes
> don't sound like a good idea...

I agree, but when one forks off a child the parent pcm handle
automatically passes to the child. If there is a possibility _not_ to
pass the PCM handle to the forked process then I would be quite happy as


Dr. Werner Van Belle

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/attachments/20090525/62e4f63b/attachment.sig 

More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list