[alsa-devel] [PATCH 09/20] OMAP3: McBSP: Lower the maximum buffersize for McBSP1, 3, 4, 5

Jarkko Nikula jhnikula at gmail.com
Fri Jul 31 19:26:11 CEST 2009


On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:58:23 +0300
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin at nokia.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:57:21PM +0200, ext Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:49:32 +0300
> > Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin at nokia.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi at nokia.com>
> > > 
> > > Do not allow applications to use the full buffer found on
> > > McBSP1,3,4,5. Using the full buffer in threshold mode causes
> > > the McBSP buffer to run dry, which can be observed as channels
> > > are switching (in reality the channels are shifting).
> > > 
> > ...
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c
> > > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static struct omap_mcbsp_platform_data
> > > omap34xx_mcbsp_pdata[] = { .rx_irq		=
> > > INT_24XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_RX, .tx_irq		=
> > > INT_24XX_MCBSP1_IRQ_TX, .ops		= &omap2_mcbsp_ops,
> > > -		.buffer_size	= 0x7F,
> > > +		.buffer_size	= 0x6F,
> > >  	},
> > 
> > Is it possible that also McBSP2 would require that maximum burst
> > transmit size should be 0x10 smaller than size of internal
> > buffer/fifo?
> 
> That's already not at full size. There is room for 1024+256 places on
> mcbsp2.
> 
True, but I was wondering can this same problem occur also on McBSP2 if
using proper size threshold? Like size near the McBSP2 audio buffer
(1024x32) or near the TX buffer (256x32).

-- 
Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe alsa-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



More information about the Alsa-devel mailing list