[alsa-devel] Timer instability
mznyfn at 0pointer.de
Tue Feb 24 04:21:40 CET 2009
On Mon, 23.02.09 20:20, Lennart Poettering (mznyfn at 0pointer.de) wrote:
> On Mon, 23.02.09 03:56, Lennart Poettering (mznyfn at 0pointer.de) wrote:
> > Hmm, for now my little testing experiment I've now found es1969,
> > ens1371, intel8x0, snd-emu10k1 and some intel-hda to have unreliable
> > _avail() or _delay().
> And here's the output for HDA STAC92xx:
> The first dump is the interesting one: when audio starts to play the
> buffer abruptly runs empty in just 20us after the device started. (The
> rightmost column is the state btw, 3 == playing).
> A quick overview of cards where _delay() and/or _avail() are unreliable:
> intel-hda on STAC92xx
> intel-hda on AD1989B
And here's another one, for intel-hda on ALC883:
Sometimes snd_pcm_avail() returns values like 4611686018427387098.
Smells like another overflow to me.
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
More information about the Alsa-devel