[alsa-devel] [PATCHv4 00/20] OMAP ASoC changes in DMA utilization
eduardo.valentin at nokia.com
Wed Aug 19 09:40:12 CEST 2009
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:05:49PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:50:59 +0300
> Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin at nokia.com> wrote:
> > Hello again guys,
> > Here is version 4 of these changes. No real changes from previous versions.
> > The only thing is that now I've rebased on top of Takashi's tree:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git;a=summary
> > as there are pending things there which Jarkko has pointed on previous series.
> Here's my ack to the ASoC part. I tested the set on top of these
> Janusz's patches:
> Note, that I posted modified version for the patch 16 based on Janusz's
> [PATCH 3/3 v3].
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula at gmail.com>
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c | 5 +
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/mcbsp.h | 49 ++++
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c | 377 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > sound/soc/omap/omap-mcbsp.c | 78 ++++++-
> > sound/soc/omap/omap-pcm.c | 14 +-
> > sound/soc/omap/omap-pcm.h | 2 +
> > 6 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> Tony, if you are ok with the OMAP McBSP changes, how it would be best
> get these merged? Via ASoC, LKML or separately from both
> subsystems during the merge window?
About these changes. I have one doubt. What is the correct tree to base them?
There are changes under arch/arm/plat-omap/ and under sound/soc/omap/.
Should I base them:
- all 20 patches against sound-2.6.git tree (Takashi's tree),
- all 20 patches against linux-omap.git tree (Tony's tree),
- make mcbsp part against Tony's tree and asoc part against Takashi's tree
Please do not apply this version. Let's define this first, then I send
the correct version.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe alsa-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the Alsa-devel