[alsa-devel] HG -> GIT migration
rene.herman at keyaccess.nl
Wed May 21 17:29:56 CEST 2008
On 21-05-08 16:52, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 21 May 2008 16:40:37 +0200,
> Rene Herman wrote:
>> I'm also still frequently trying to figure out an/the efficient way of
>> using GIT but it does seem it's not just a matter of "pure downstream"
>> (which I do believe ALSA has few enough of to not make this be a huge
>> problem). For example linux-next is also going to want to pull in ALSA
>> and say it does, finds a trivial conflict with the trivial tree that it
>> also pulls in and fixes things up. If you rebase that which linux-next
>> pulls from I believe it will have to redo the fix next time it pulls
>> from you since it's getting all those new changesets.
>> I guess this can be avoided by just not rebasing that which linux-next
>> is pulling... and I in fact don't even know if linux-next does any
>> conflict resolution itself, trivial or otherwise.
> I thought linux-next does fresh merges at each time, thus it doesn't
> matter whether a subsystem tree is rebased or not...
Fresh merges at each release boundary certainly but if it drops/remerges
each subsystem when a bug in its for-next branch is found (a supposedly
non rare occurence) all the hopefully hundreds or even thousands of
linux-next pullers/testers would seem to have to deal with all those
completely new merges everytime as well. I'd hope linux-next during a
single release would just pull in the one fix (the subsystem's for-linus
branch can still fold it in).
More information about the Alsa-devel