[alsa-devel] [PATCH] ad1848 and cs4231 busy loop replacement
rene.herman at gmail.com
Sun Sep 9 23:19:56 CEST 2007
On 09/09/2007 11:09 PM, Rene Herman wrote:
> Given that the only difference is that I wait less, yours would've
> worked as well -- thanks for looking into this! And could you viceversa
> test this on AD1848 and perhaps resubmit if you agree?
Oh, and I forgot to say (sigh) that I use a mdelay() and not an msleep() in
the ad1848 one due to the 1 ms being short enough and didn't keep the
snd_printd() because if one, then all please...
If you yourself insist on keeping a change like that split off, then doing
that as a second patch ontop is best I guess but I suspect Takashi wouldn't
mind trivial stuff like that anymore than I would -- we're not rule-driven
More information about the Alsa-devel